Teen Faces Trial In Deaths

AKRON, Ohio (AP) – A teenager charged in a deadly scheme to lure victims with phony Craigslist job offers went on trial on murder charges Tuesday, waving to prospective jurors when he was introduced in court and taking notes and conferring with his attorneys during jury selection.

Brogan Rafferty, 17, of Stow, is being tried as an adult. He and his co-defendant, Richard Beasley, 53, of Akron, have pleaded not guilty. Beasley will be tried separately.

Three men were killed last year – two in Noble County in southeast Ohio and one found slain in Summit County near an Akron shopping mall – after responding to what authorities said were bogus online job postings.

Rafferty, who was then 16, is suspected of helping Beasley lure victims with bogus job offers.

Rafferty cannot face execution because he was a juvenile at the time of the crimes. Instead, he could face life in prison.

Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty against Beasley.

Jury selection in Summit County Common Pleas Court in Akron could last several days and the judge told prospective jurors the trial could take six weeks. Opening statements and testimony are scheduled to begin Friday.

Rafferty, dressed in khaki slacks and a green, short-sleeve jersey, waved to prospective jurors with a tight-lipped smile when his attorney introduced him. The initial session was moved to a larger courtroom to accommodate the 56 prospective jurors.

Judge Lynne Callahan told the prospective jurors to avoid news reports on the high-profile case.

When the initial juror questioning was moved to a smaller courtroom for individual interviews, Rafferty took notes on a yellow legal pad and occasionally leaned over to whisper to a member of the defense team.

The initial prospective jurors interviewed by the judge and attorneys seemed familiar with the allegations, one describing Rafferty as having claimed he was “brainwashed” and other calling him “somehow associated” with Beasley.

Despite the case’s high profile, the judge said she wasn’t looking for jurors who hadn’t heard anything about it, but ones who could put preconceptions aside and listen to the evidence.