Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Get to the Bottom Of Benghazi Attack

January 24, 2013

During the weeks before the November presidential election, questions about the Sept. 11 attack that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans came primarily from Republicans....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(35)

TrollSlayer

Jan-24-13 6:56 AM

“Now, both Democrats and Republicans in Congress want to know...”? Did you listen to the hearings? Only REPUBLICANS want to know. Democrits did nothing but toss our fawning praise of a failed Secretary and pathetic softballs about irrelevant details, that did nothing but insult the memories of our murdered diplomats.

When faced with the FACT that her Department and others in the Obama Administration LIED to the American people about this entire Obama-scandalous affair, for DAYS after they knew the truth, Hillary’s response “What difference does it make?” was representative of the Obama Administration’s total lack of concern for truth in every respect. Pathetic, Dems. The families of our terrorist-murdered diplomats DESERVE BETTER.

7 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

LogHog

Jan-24-13 7:51 AM

billary used the same system that many in high places use..they know that most people in the US don't care what they do as long as the govt. checks keep coming...MR. Speaker, Mr.True caring American...Our Republic is not strong...it is getting weaker by the day

5 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

SpankysLastDance

Jan-24-13 8:22 AM

DemoCommies are a joke. The Hillary Hearings were a joke. The Commies oogled all over Hilliary while the repubs took pokes at her. Our government is a joke! the only questioner that made any sense was Rand Paul when he told her that he would have fired her. The N-R thinks we need to get to the bottom of the Benghazi attacks! You know what is at the bottom of it? Commie Democrats. Incompetent Commie Democrats!

7 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

impact

Jan-24-13 9:37 AM

Yawn!

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-24-13 10:30 AM

Impact "Yawn"

Hillary Clinton "What difference does it make?"

I see the Demorats are in lockstep here...

7 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

promo61

Jan-24-13 10:39 AM

Liberal crisis management 101 on display here. Wait until the media attention wanes, stonewall handing over information, then publicly decry the proceedings. We ain't stoopid.

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Gooseman

Jan-24-13 10:48 AM

Facts beyond being disputed:

far right extremists tried to play politics with the deaths of American patriots...pathetic

mittens roMONEY proved the fool he was by rushing to a microphone, flags waving, acting like he had already won the Presidency....lol

President Obama "please proceed Governor"....lol

And roMONEY did proceed......back to his car elevator....Praise the Lord.

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

promo61

Jan-24-13 11:34 AM

If Goose is a christian, I'm exploring other options.

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-24-13 11:40 AM

Gooseman is a Christian the same way her messiah Obama is a Christian. When politically expedient, or as a convenient turn of phrase.

Gooseman "Praise the Lord!"

God "What? You talkin' to me?"

LOL

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-24-13 11:50 AM

Gooseman “far right extremists tried to play politics with the deaths of American patriots...pathetic”

Obama “When four Americans get killed, it's not optimal.” The vast majority of Americans consider that a disgraceful understatement, Mr. Vacationer in Chief.

Obama “I was pretty certain and continue to be pretty certain that there are going to be bumps in the road” The vast majority of Americans consider the deaths of four American diplomatic staff to be horrifically more significant than “bumps in the road,” Mr. Partier in Chief.

Obama's Secretary of State, regarding the Administration's lies about the cause of the deaths of an American Ambassador and three diplomatic staff members "What difference does it make?" Unbelievable.

Now, Barry, are you going to get to the bottom of this fatal debacle, or are you going to continue to stonewall as you have in all your other debacles. Because the families of those murdered American diplomats, and the American People DESERVE BET

5 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-24-13 11:51 AM

BARRY BENGHAZI, the American People DESERVE BETTER!

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Jan-24-13 7:59 PM

Greecemon, still want to tell about Romney lied about Jeep moving to China??

BBBWHAHAHAHAH!

"So what?? an American Ambassador was attacked, stripped, raped in ***)), sodomized with a broom stick and rifle barrels, then paraded through the streets like Road Kill on a WV backroad ????" SO WHAT????

Well Mrs. Bill "the BJ" Clinton, back in the day when George W. was President, these towel heads would be getting THEIR A&& raped by a CRUISE MISSILE!!!

THAT is the DIFFERENCE, you stupid C****!

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Jan-25-13 8:39 AM

UNDISPUTED FACT: The GOP CONTROLLED HOUSE cut the STATE DEPT. BUDGET FOR SECURITY. Why is this FACT left out of this news rag and every FAUX NOISE report on this subject?

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-25-13 10:16 AM

UNDISPUTED FACT: The top-level cut to the State Dept. budget for security had NOTHING to do with the COMPLETE LACK OF SECURITY provided by the OBAMA Administration specifically at Behghazi when our Ambassador and our three diplomats were murdered by Islamic terrorists.

UNDISPUTED FACT: The top-level cut to the State Dept. budget for security had NOTHING to do with the FATALLY IRRESPONSIBLE OBAMA Administration’s decision to leave American diplomats in high-terrorist threat Benghazi with NO security.

UNDISPUTED FACT: The top-level cut to the State Dept. budget for security had NOTHING to do with the OBFUSCATING OBAMA Administration’s BOLD FACED LIES to the American People, for FIVE DAYS after their FATAL BENGHAZI DEBACLE.

Why are these FACTS beyond comprehension for CLUELESS DEMOCRITS who make EXCUSES and DIVERSIONS and PASS THE BUCK every time their FAILED OBAMA Administration is involved in another FATAL DEBACLE?

mmm mmm mmm, pass the buck

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

WVEXPAT

Jan-25-13 11:10 AM

From the Huffington Post, "The Washington Post informs with a story out of Afghanistan about how the Department of State, after signing a ten-year lease and spending more than $80 million on a site envisioned as the United States' diplomatic hub in northern Afghanistan, have abandoned their plans. Why does the State Department consistently make poor decisions like this?"

So the State Dept wastes $80 million but R's are blamed for budget issues!!!

4 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

sounder

Jan-25-13 6:10 PM

TrollSlayer; as per usual you happened to take what the Secretary of State out of context in that her statement of what difference does it make was only the beginning of a sentence; the ending of that comment clarified what she meant. What was evident in those hearings were some of the off the wall comments including that of that petulent Senator from Kentucky, Rand Paul, that no one from the Tea Party should never receive enough votes to ever gain entrance into the White House. As the Governor of Louisiana and the former Governor of Alabama stated today in a press conference and on the cable news networks--the Republican Party has to stop being the party of the dumb; you won't win a national election by allowing the extreme elements of the conservative base by setting the agenda. That would seem to leave much of Wheeling in the ditch, ditto for the NR.

5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-25-13 7:26 PM

sounder, so let’s put it IN context.

Senator Ron Johnson “We were misled that there were supposedly protests and then something spread out of that - an assault sprang out of that. And that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact. And the American people could have known that within days and they didn't know that.”

Clinton “With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest? Or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they would go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?”

So, IN CONTEXT, the question was, AS I SAID, regarding the Administration's lies about the cause of the deaths. And the “honorable” Clinton’s response was “...protest?... or guys out for a walk... What difference at this point does it make?”

And to top it off, you liberals agree with her. What difference does it make that the Obama Administration LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? Seriously?

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-25-13 7:28 PM

So, sounder, YOU are the one putting statements out of context by suggesting I said her remarks were about the deaths and not about the lies. I was exactly correct, in context, and you are just spreading the liberals’ lies. Which makes you a typical lying liberal. Deal with it, tool.

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-25-13 8:34 PM

Here’s the REST of Clinton’s statement, which you claim “clarified what she meant.”

Clinton “What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the-the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The I.C. has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But, you know to be clear, it is from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it, than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we'll figure out what was going on in the meantime.”

Johnson “OK, thank you Madam Secretary.”

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-25-13 8:35 PM

Yes, it’s crystal clear, AS I SAID, that Clinton’s pathetic diversion “What difference at this point does it make?” IN CONTEXT, was about the reason for the attack: “as to why these militants decided they did it.” Which, AS I SAID, is what the Obama Administration LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT. FOR FIVE DAYS. Disgusting lack of honesty for a President, Barry Benghazi Obfuscator. And sounder supports those lies and that obfuscation before a Congressional investigation. Pathetic.

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Jan-27-13 10:22 AM

" Well Mrs. Bill "the BJ" Clinton, back in the day when George W. was President, these towel heads would be getting THEIR A&& raped by a CRUISE MISSILE!!!

THAT is the DIFFERENCE, you stupid C****!

WRONG... BOY GEORGE WOULD MOST LIKELY WOULD HAVE STARTED A WAR WITH MEXICO, YOU KNOW KIND OF LIKE GOING TO WAR WITH IRAQ FOR 9/11

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-27-13 11:35 PM

Clueless, we went to war in AFGHANISTAN for 9/11, less than a month after 9/11/2001. The war in Iraq started on March 20, 2003, over a year and a half AFTER 9/11/2001, and for reasons OTHER than 9/11, as clearly stated in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq bill, which Obama’s Vice President, then Senator Biden, and Obama’s Secretary of State, then Senator Hillary Clinton, both voted FOR.

Are you still confusing the Iraq and Afghanistan wars? They’re different countries, you know. LOL

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

wvhoopie

Jan-28-13 9:29 AM

The House has the power to investigate and pursue whatever action they deem necessary. But watch the conservatives just let this sleeping dog lie and move on. The conservatives have no direction.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Jan-28-13 11:09 AM

TrollSlayer.... BOY GEORGE BUSH himself was the one that linked Iraq and 9/11. go back and read any of his transcripts from any of his speeches you'll see. He never mentioned Iraq without mentioning 9/11 right after.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-28-13 11:16 AM

So did the evil genius Bush trick Hillary and Jokin’ Joe Biden into voting for that war? Maybe you’re right. Good thing Bush was on good terms with President Fox, or he might have tricked Hillary and Jokin’ Joe into invading Juarez.

And “But BUSH!”? Is that STILL still a good excuse for all of Barry’s Obenghazi’s wars? ugh...

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 35 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

EZToUse.com

I am looking for: