Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Get to the Bottom Of Benghazi Attack

January 24, 2013

During the weeks before the November presidential election, questions about the Sept. 11 attack that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans came primarily from Republicans....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(35)

oldsteelmaker

Jan-28-13 7:37 PM

By the way, since most of the libs, particularly splat, have forgotten, I would like to point out the Secretary of State, in her previous job as Senator from New York, stated on the record that she was not relying on the Bush Administration for the information she used to decide in favor of the Iraq war vote. She had "independent sources" that confirmed the WMD claims.

So if old George was impeachable, should she have been recalled? How about now, should she be thrown out of office?

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Jan-28-13 6:41 PM

How about a-hole liberals tell us about "JEEP is NOT GOING to build vehicles in China"

Rated by Politifact as the BIGGEST LIE of 2012!

BBWhHAHAHAHAHAhAH!

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-28-13 5:39 PM

impacted, Iraq was impeachable? Since your Vice Presi-dunce Jokin’ Joe Biden and your next Presidential candi-dolt Hillary both voted FOR the Iraq war, do you really want “reopen that can of worms”? LOL

impacted “Every time someone relates an "UNDISPUTED FACT", It's anything but AN UNDISPUTED FACT!” Good point. Take, for instance, Clueless’s assertion “UNDISPUTED FACT: The GOP CONTROLLED HOUSE cut the STATE DEPT. BUDGET FOR SECURITY.” First, since the House can’t act unilaterally to cut ANYTHING, that ridiculous assertion is certainly disputable. Second, since the Senate hasn’t passed a Federal Budget for FOUR YEARS, it’s difficult to see where ANYONE could have made any State Dept Budget cuts for ANYTHING. But thanks for inviting me to point that out. LOL

impacted “I don't want to be accused of plagerism.” “Plagerism”? How about accused of murdering the English language? LOL

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Jan-28-13 5:28 PM

And Imphat hasn't stated a fact here since Al Gore invented the Internet . . . .

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

impact

Jan-28-13 3:54 PM

Every time someone relates an "UNDISPUTED FACT", It's anything but AN UNDISPUTED FACT!

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

impact

Jan-28-13 3:50 PM

Trollsucker, you don't even want to reopen that can of worms (Iraq). That truly was an impeachable offense!

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

impact

Jan-28-13 3:48 PM

GETACLUE, don't forget the oft added admonition that Saddam was a threat "...in the shape of a mushroom cloud..." LOL! What a joke he was. Barry buries Dubya on the Best/Worst President's List.

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

impact

Jan-28-13 3:44 PM

Wrat, you, the rest of the gang of six and the eidotr of this rag prove the truth of that old adage every day. What a maroon! (With thanks to Bugs Bunny. I don't want to be accused of plagerism.)

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Jan-28-13 11:55 AM

How many times will ClueA&& repeat the same assinine wrong point over and over and over and over and over.

I guess if you repeat the same lie 100 times it becomes the truth???

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-28-13 11:19 AM

wvhoopie “The conservatives have no direction”

... says a stooge of the “progressive” Democrit Party that has FAILED to direct America’s spending by FAILING to produce a Federal Budget in FOUR YEARS, as required BY LAW.

22 MILLION Americans STILL unemployed or underemployed, and the RECORD 48 MILLION Americans now surviving on Food Stamps want to know what “direction” the Democrit Party that has held the White House for four years, and the majority in the Senate for six years, and the majority in the House of Representatives for four of the last six years, is taking us.

Forward? Looks like a DOWNWARD spiral to that 15% of America stuck in Democrit-created poverty. Maybe that’s what Hillary meant when she stonewalled Republicans investigating Benghazi with the pathetic answer “What difference at this point does it make?”

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-28-13 11:16 AM

So did the evil genius Bush trick Hillary and Jokin’ Joe Biden into voting for that war? Maybe you’re right. Good thing Bush was on good terms with President Fox, or he might have tricked Hillary and Jokin’ Joe into invading Juarez.

And “But BUSH!”? Is that STILL still a good excuse for all of Barry’s Obenghazi’s wars? ugh...

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Jan-28-13 11:09 AM

TrollSlayer.... BOY GEORGE BUSH himself was the one that linked Iraq and 9/11. go back and read any of his transcripts from any of his speeches you'll see. He never mentioned Iraq without mentioning 9/11 right after.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

wvhoopie

Jan-28-13 9:29 AM

The House has the power to investigate and pursue whatever action they deem necessary. But watch the conservatives just let this sleeping dog lie and move on. The conservatives have no direction.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-27-13 11:35 PM

Clueless, we went to war in AFGHANISTAN for 9/11, less than a month after 9/11/2001. The war in Iraq started on March 20, 2003, over a year and a half AFTER 9/11/2001, and for reasons OTHER than 9/11, as clearly stated in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq bill, which Obama’s Vice President, then Senator Biden, and Obama’s Secretary of State, then Senator Hillary Clinton, both voted FOR.

Are you still confusing the Iraq and Afghanistan wars? They’re different countries, you know. LOL

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Jan-27-13 10:22 AM

" Well Mrs. Bill "the BJ" Clinton, back in the day when George W. was President, these towel heads would be getting THEIR A&& raped by a CRUISE MISSILE!!!

THAT is the DIFFERENCE, you stupid C****!

WRONG... BOY GEORGE WOULD MOST LIKELY WOULD HAVE STARTED A WAR WITH MEXICO, YOU KNOW KIND OF LIKE GOING TO WAR WITH IRAQ FOR 9/11

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-25-13 8:35 PM

Yes, it’s crystal clear, AS I SAID, that Clinton’s pathetic diversion “What difference at this point does it make?” IN CONTEXT, was about the reason for the attack: “as to why these militants decided they did it.” Which, AS I SAID, is what the Obama Administration LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT. FOR FIVE DAYS. Disgusting lack of honesty for a President, Barry Benghazi Obfuscator. And sounder supports those lies and that obfuscation before a Congressional investigation. Pathetic.

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-25-13 8:34 PM

Here’s the REST of Clinton’s statement, which you claim “clarified what she meant.”

Clinton “What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the-the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The I.C. has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But, you know to be clear, it is from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it, than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we'll figure out what was going on in the meantime.”

Johnson “OK, thank you Madam Secretary.”

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-25-13 7:28 PM

So, sounder, YOU are the one putting statements out of context by suggesting I said her remarks were about the deaths and not about the lies. I was exactly correct, in context, and you are just spreading the liberals’ lies. Which makes you a typical lying liberal. Deal with it, tool.

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-25-13 7:26 PM

sounder, so let’s put it IN context.

Senator Ron Johnson “We were misled that there were supposedly protests and then something spread out of that - an assault sprang out of that. And that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact. And the American people could have known that within days and they didn't know that.”

Clinton “With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest? Or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they would go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?”

So, IN CONTEXT, the question was, AS I SAID, regarding the Administration's lies about the cause of the deaths. And the “honorable” Clinton’s response was “...protest?... or guys out for a walk... What difference at this point does it make?”

And to top it off, you liberals agree with her. What difference does it make that the Obama Administration LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? Seriously?

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

sounder

Jan-25-13 6:10 PM

TrollSlayer; as per usual you happened to take what the Secretary of State out of context in that her statement of what difference does it make was only the beginning of a sentence; the ending of that comment clarified what she meant. What was evident in those hearings were some of the off the wall comments including that of that petulent Senator from Kentucky, Rand Paul, that no one from the Tea Party should never receive enough votes to ever gain entrance into the White House. As the Governor of Louisiana and the former Governor of Alabama stated today in a press conference and on the cable news networks--the Republican Party has to stop being the party of the dumb; you won't win a national election by allowing the extreme elements of the conservative base by setting the agenda. That would seem to leave much of Wheeling in the ditch, ditto for the NR.

5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

WVEXPAT

Jan-25-13 11:10 AM

From the Huffington Post, "The Washington Post informs with a story out of Afghanistan about how the Department of State, after signing a ten-year lease and spending more than $80 million on a site envisioned as the United States' diplomatic hub in northern Afghanistan, have abandoned their plans. Why does the State Department consistently make poor decisions like this?"

So the State Dept wastes $80 million but R's are blamed for budget issues!!!

4 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-25-13 10:16 AM

UNDISPUTED FACT: The top-level cut to the State Dept. budget for security had NOTHING to do with the COMPLETE LACK OF SECURITY provided by the OBAMA Administration specifically at Behghazi when our Ambassador and our three diplomats were murdered by Islamic terrorists.

UNDISPUTED FACT: The top-level cut to the State Dept. budget for security had NOTHING to do with the FATALLY IRRESPONSIBLE OBAMA Administration’s decision to leave American diplomats in high-terrorist threat Benghazi with NO security.

UNDISPUTED FACT: The top-level cut to the State Dept. budget for security had NOTHING to do with the OBFUSCATING OBAMA Administration’s BOLD FACED LIES to the American People, for FIVE DAYS after their FATAL BENGHAZI DEBACLE.

Why are these FACTS beyond comprehension for CLUELESS DEMOCRITS who make EXCUSES and DIVERSIONS and PASS THE BUCK every time their FAILED OBAMA Administration is involved in another FATAL DEBACLE?

mmm mmm mmm, pass the buck

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Jan-25-13 8:39 AM

UNDISPUTED FACT: The GOP CONTROLLED HOUSE cut the STATE DEPT. BUDGET FOR SECURITY. Why is this FACT left out of this news rag and every FAUX NOISE report on this subject?

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Jan-24-13 7:59 PM

Greecemon, still want to tell about Romney lied about Jeep moving to China??

BBBWHAHAHAHAH!

"So what?? an American Ambassador was attacked, stripped, raped in ***)), sodomized with a broom stick and rifle barrels, then paraded through the streets like Road Kill on a WV backroad ????" SO WHAT????

Well Mrs. Bill "the BJ" Clinton, back in the day when George W. was President, these towel heads would be getting THEIR A&& raped by a CRUISE MISSILE!!!

THAT is the DIFFERENCE, you stupid C****!

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-24-13 11:51 AM

BARRY BENGHAZI, the American People DESERVE BETTER!

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 35 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 
 

EZToUse.com

I am looking for: