Senate Rejects Stopgap Efforts

Do Do, turn on Faux nooz and stay in ga ga land where you seem to be happy.

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

oldman, are you PAID by the NR to do comic relief here?

You are VERY good at it, I am LMF AO constantly at you stupidity.

I guess that Trillion dollar Stimulus Obama signed goes on Bush Credit card.

George W. should have him arrested for Identity Theft!!!!

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Budman, Are you saying you think the truth is funny? How about the well documented facts? Do you think the facts are funny to? Wow, your easy to entertain.

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

my head aches and my hair hurts whenever a politician speaks.

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

@oldman: You are a very funny guy.

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

So "maby you can find someone to help you"!

You do know most 5th graders know how to spell "maybe"!

4 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

@oldman, Since you so enjoy the White House Historical tables, maybe you should check out Fiscal Year 2008 Table 1.3—SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS, OUTLAYS, AND SURPLUSES OR DEFICITS (–) IN CURRENT DOLLARS, CONSTANT (FY 2000) DOLLARS.

The Bush budget had us on track for a $61 Billion surplus in 2012!!!

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Wraith I got it this time!

@oldman,

From the White House Table 7.1—FEDERAL DEBT AT THE END OF YEAR: 1940–2017

Federal debt by the end of 2017 - $21,325,493,000,000

So lets give Obama a 2 year window and only calculate Obama's debt from 2010 on! The Federal debt at the end of that year was $13,528,807,000,000.

You'll not find many Conservatives fond of Bush's spending, but Obama is the undisputed King of Federal indebtedness. The information from the White House's website proves it beyond a shadow of a doubt!

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

If you do the math Obama is spending less than Bush. I know you far righties can't do math but maby you can find someone to help you. About any 5th grader could explain it to you.

0 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Do do Bushes 1,565 billon deficit spending was in place when Obama took office and is still piling on the debt. learn to deal with the FACTS and stop the bullship.

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

if you keep putting a newer bandaid (stopgap)over old ones each time because you are afraid to see the ( debt maintenance )blood, you will get an infection with no cure. The people who care are dying off and the progressive loonies are becoming the majority.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

oldmanonhiscan, here is your {Bleepng} precious US HISTORICAL DATA: Whitehouse . gov Table 7.1—FEDERAL DEBT AT THE END OF YEAR: 1940–2017

(IN TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS)

1992 $4.001

1993 $4.351 Clinton takes office

1994 $4.643

1995 $4.920

1996 $5.181

1997 $5.369

1998 $5.478

1999 $5.605

2000 $5.628

2001 $5.769 Bush takes office

2002 $6.198

2003 $6.760

2004 $7.354

2005 $7.905

2006 $8.451

2007 $8.950

2008 $9.986

2009 $11.875 Obama takes Office

2010 $13.528

2011 $14.764

2012 est $16.350

2013 est $17.547

Now please read them and STFU!

5 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

feeble_deranged_geriatric_oldman, how many times do you have to be hit over the head with US GOVERNMENT DATA before you are full of CRAP!

You keep babbling the same old shat day after day after day after day after day day after day after day after day day after day after day after day.

Get your head out of your a&&, you haven't presented one FACT, just your discredited OPINION.

4 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Wvpat, Don'forget Buuuush putting his war of choice cost on someone elses credit card. Theres no hope for you unless you quit watchin Faux Nooz and develop a mind of your own.

0 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Wvex, multiply 1,300 billion by 4 and get someone to explain the results to you. Try checking the site I suggested and learn the truth. You righties lie when rhe truth would sound better and never let the facts get in the way.

0 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

And while you never know what goes on in poster's lives, it's quite interesting that Goose, (his brother) Wonder and Hoopie (to some extent) are largely absent on these topics!

I guess even liberals have figured out that the lies being spread by this admin diminish the party's dignity!

Their silence speaks volumes!!

6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Again, many apologies if you are indeed a challenged adolescent or indeed an old man in a van (most likely down by the river)!

4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

@ Oldmansvan

Federal debt Jan 2000 $5.628 Trillion.

Federal debt Jan 2008 $9.986 Trillion.

Federal debt Jan 2013 $16.35 Trillion

Federal debt (est) Jan 2016 $20.391 Trillion

That's $20,391 Billion in debt and liberals are having a fit about reducing the increases in spending by $43 billion! Obama is having a having a meltdown over .002% of that total!!

(Google Whitehouse dotgov historical tables Table 7.1—FEDERAL DEBT AT THE END OF YEAR: 1940–2017)

Oldman, My apologies if you are indeed very old and somewhat infirm! If so, please accept my submittal of the White House dot gov Historical tables as my reference! I know how fond you are of the White House's Historical tables!

So my apologies if you are so constricted! If not, you are an utter MORON and have no idea what you are posting!!!

Please post some facts! Something other than bbbbbut Bush or Fauxxxxx nooze, if you are able!

6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Jan. 2000: 265 billion surplus. Jan. 2008 after 8 years of Bush: 1,300 billion deficit. Even Faux Nooz viewers should be able to figure this out. Go figure.

2 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Walks you are brilliant!!

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

so. I see that Obama did say "I'm not a dictator" sounds like Nixon when he said "I'm not a crook" Well, if your not, your sure acting like one.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Investors dot com:

" Budget: When President Obama put out his "balanced" plan to avoid the automatic sequester cuts, no one noticed. Which is probably just as well for Obama, given how embarrassingly unbalanced it is.

Last week, New York Times columnist David Brooks wrote about how Obama "hasn't actually come up with a proposal to avert sequestration, let alone one that is politically plausible."

Turns out, Obama did have one, although Brooks can be excused for not knowing it, since the administration hasn't exactly been promoting this so-called plan.

That, too, is understandable, since it isn't a plan at all, just a list of numbers with little to back them up.

There are no details, for example, about the $200 billion in cuts to defense and domestic discretionary programs, other than that Obama wants them split evenly.

And while he offers $400 billion in "health savings," 30% are lumped in a bucket labeled "other."

BBBWHAHAHAHAAH

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Man, that fair share thing can come back to bite you big time! Who knew?

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

stopgap. I force you to lease my car with requirement you insure it, make payments, haul me wherever I want to go, but I remove the gas tank and give you a pait of mittens and cleated shoes as gesture I care about you.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

And now you can stop wondering why they support the bill to help all illegal aliens.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »