Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Manchin Pushing For Gun Checks

March 6, 2013

WHEELING — Sen. Joe Manchin is among a group of senators pushing to expand background check requirements for all gun purchases, including firearms sold at gun shows. Manchin, D-W.Va....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(78)

TrollSlayer

Mar-10-13 3:44 PM

Will that universal Government firearms registry be subject to the Freedom of Information Act? Because I can’t think of a better way to let thieves know just where to go to steal the guns of their choice than to read the addresses in the local left-wing newspaper.

Barry Ogungrabber has boosted gun and ammo sales through the roof. Next it will be gun safes and security systems that will be selling like hotcakes. Who says Barry Brainless isn't stimulating business?

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Mar-10-13 11:08 AM

Sofa-king stupid Cluesap, "LOG ..... How many cases of voter fraud in the last 10 years????? "

I just answered your question times five and you still are scratching your ***ls for a comeback?

If my IQ were as low are yours, I would be ashamed to come here and exhibit it.

Explain how total votes exceed registered voters and even TOTAL POPULATION in some Blue counties???

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Triton

Mar-09-13 4:51 PM

After scrolling through the comments, its pretty clear that America really is nuts and cannot compromise or even listen to each other. Or be civil. Not worth bothering with this story's comments. I guess I can always hope that there still is a moderate majority that does not have rage and hate issues.

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Mar-09-13 10:37 AM

WOW daWeeb.... Am I supposed to find your fictitious stories credible simply because you put dates on them? WHAT COMIC BOOK DID YOU FIND THEM IN? I also love how you have debated the heart of the topic 2nd AMENDMENT INFRINGEMENT.......FAIL FAIL FAIL

0 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Mar-09-13 9:45 AM

The American Dream cont'd:

" Yes, we always knew that urban areas would lean very heavily toward Obama, but are we actually expected to believe that Obama got over 99% of the votes in those areas? In more than 50 different precincts, Romney received 2 votes or less. Considering how important the swing state of Ohio was to the national election, one would think that such improbable results would get the attention of somebody out there. Could we be looking at evidence of election fraud hidden in plain sight? "

Just how {bleeeping} dumb ARE you, Clue????????????

6 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Mar-09-13 9:44 AM

11/12/2012

Barack Obama received more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio on election day. In fact, there were a substantial number of precincts where Mitt Romney got exactly zero votes. So how in the world did this happen?

THIRD WORLD DICTATORS DON’T EVEN GET 99% OF THE VOTE. Overall, Mitt Romney received 30.12% of the vote in Cuyahoga County. There were even a bunch of precincts in Cuyahoga County that Romney actually won. But everyone certainly expected that Cuyahoga County would be Obama territory. And in most of the precincts that is exactly what we saw – large numbers of votes for both candidates but a definite edge for Obama. However, there are more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County where the voting results can only be described as truly bizarre.

6 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Mar-09-13 9:41 AM

11/9/2012

"Forest Park is a city of about 19,000 residents in the northern suburbs of Cincinnati, Ohio, in Hamilton County. In 2008, Hamilton County voted for Barack Obama while most of the surrounding counties in Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana voted Republican. With so many eyes on Ohio in yesterday’s election, it was no surprise to see this news story on the local news.

A couple from Forest Park showed up yesterday at the polls to vote just like they have ever since they turned 18. When it was their turn, they were both told that they had already voted via absentee ballot. The couple said that they have never voted absentee and wanted to know how this could happen."

Before long, a number of other voters in the same precinct were told the same thing, that they had already voted via absentee ballots and that they also needed to fill out a provisional ballot.

4 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Mar-09-13 9:40 AM

9/4/2012:

"A review of voter registration data for ten counties in Colorado details a pattern of voter bloat inflating registration rolls to numbers larger than the total voting age population. Using publicly available voter data and comparing it to U.S. Census records reveals the ten counties having a total registration ranging between 104 to 140 percent of the respective populations.

Counties such as Gilpin and Hinsdale have 110 percent of their populations registered to vote. Gilpin County has a total population of 5,441 with 17.4% of the population below the voting age, making the highest possible number of registered voters 4,494. Currently Gilpin County has 4909 registered voters. Hinsdale County has a total population of 830 with 20% of the population below the voting age, making the highest possible number of registered voters 664. At 110 percent registration, that means that there are 515 excess voter registrations in Gilpin county and 68 excess registrations

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Mar-09-13 9:36 AM

CLUElazz you are Sofa-king stupid that giving you facts is as worthless as pizzing in the Pacific because you too dumb to understand!

11/9/2012; "Mr. Obama won Wood County in Ohio this year. That's right, Mr. Obama won the majority of Wood County's 108% of registered voters. That's not a typo.

In 2012, 106,258 people in Wood County are registered to vote out of an eligible 98,213. But it certainly must all be a coincidence, right?"

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

LogHog

Mar-09-13 7:50 AM

four yrs. to comply...yea, sure...four yrs. to comply with your gun laws would be about correct...by that time a very Big Change will be completed in this country

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

LogHog

Mar-09-13 7:47 AM

no concern of the last 10yrs..just of the last election...some of the ones that voted several times in the large cities admitted to it. Like the black woman running the polling location in Cinci, Ohio that voted six times herself...but hey,no LEFT supporter objects to that do they...The Left want the Constitution Dead...The current Left is not the same as it was during the 60s when they went to Woodstock...

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Mar-09-13 7:36 AM

LOG ..... How many cases of voter fraud in the last 10 years????? How many cases of gun violence committed with unregistered and unlicensed guns in the last ten years. YOUR HONOR I REST MY CASE!

0 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Mar-09-13 7:32 AM

LOG I have no problem with voter ID I do have a problem with enacting voter ID laws 2months before a National election. If you want to enact them then do it now and give the citizens 4 years to comply.

I love how the members of the LUNATIC FRINGE have gone into PERSONAL ATTACK MODE on me because you can't come up with any credible argument as to how my registration proposal will INFRINGE on your RIGHT TO GUN OWNERSHIP. Do try to stay on TOPIC!!!!

0 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

LogHog

Mar-09-13 5:46 AM

why is it that to have a positive picture ID to vote has been called racist and unfair by the LEFT? could it be so the stupid voters around the cities can vote several times as they have admitted in the last election? But yet,these same LEFT "leaders" are calling for positive Gun ID across the country? looks like it's because the LEFT already have the voter control they want....and now they, the LEFT want full control of the country. Via gun control....Staying Strong is to stay free...the time will come when strong free men stand together to enforce the Second amendment

6 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Thebudman

Mar-08-13 7:32 PM

"adsolute". Now there is a new word from the unabridged impact dictionary.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Mar-08-13 5:54 PM

Clueless, calm down. You’ve said other commenters “should be shoot [sic] for being an UN-AMERICAN RIGHTS TRASHING TREASONIST!!!” merely because they expressed opinions that differ from yours. You’ve threatened physical violence, like saying other commenters should be “At the very least BEATEN about the HEAD AND FACE.” And you’ve offered that you “know just the guy to do it ...ME!!!” Those statements clearly indicate you have some anger management issues and some violent tendencies that absolutely should not pass any background check designed to prevent those prone to irrational, violent behavior from possessing firearms. So, sure, when those background checks to prevent mentally unstable individuals from possessing guns go into effect, I’ll be only too happy to bet you won’t pass. Anyone can see you’re completely nuts. LOL

5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

island1

Mar-08-13 4:51 PM

you only have to register a car if you drive it on the public road .

4 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Mar-08-13 3:57 PM

Clue did it hurt that a NY town published the NAMES and ADDRESSES of registered GUN OWNERS?

UUUH several had ROBBERIES of bad guys LIKELY looking to steal guns!!!

Still waiting for you to post your name, address, and SS number here:___________?

What could possibly happen? Everybody here is a law abiding citizen, right????

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Mar-08-13 3:55 PM

Warning: child(IQ) at Play!

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

|v/

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Mar-08-13 3:06 PM

ALL GUNS should be titled, registered, licensed just like automobiles. Any sale of any gun would have to be accompanied by a transfer of title and a new license of the weapon. This should be done for ALL guns. This in no way infringes on the Second Amendment. ANYONE CAUGHT WITH A NON TITLED WEAPON SHOULD RECEIVE A 20 YEAR PRISON TERM WITH NO EARLY RELEASE. My proposal does not INFRINGE on OWNERSHIP. It doesn't prevent or criminalize RESPONSIBLE LAW ABIDING GUN OWNERS from owning as many weapons as they wish. What it does do is make it criminal to transfer ownership of a weapon without the proper background checks and title transfer. IT DOES NOT INFRINGE ON YOUR RIGHT TO OWNERSHIP OF WEAPONS.

0 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Mar-08-13 2:59 PM

TOOLPLAYER......"I’d bet your Second Amendment rights would be infringed by a background check."

I'll take that bet how much do you care to wager? PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS!!!

0 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Mar-08-13 1:09 PM

Whoops "...blah, blah, blah, constitution, blah, blah, blah..."

Exactly.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Thebudman

Mar-08-13 10:42 AM

You all need to take a 2 hour Anger Management course before you buy ammo and post on this thread.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

impact

Mar-08-13 10:15 AM

Uncommon, you are really out of it. Your own people complain about existing restraints on your rights. They are not adsolute, you dingbat!

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

impact

Mar-08-13 10:11 AM

Apparently, we haven't had enough because a large majority of the American people favor this.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 78 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

EZToUse.com

I am looking for: