Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Less Firing, Little Hiring

Companies reluctant to boost employment

August 9, 2013

WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans who have a job may take comfort in knowing that companies are laying off fewer people than at any time since before the recessio....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(5)

CherokeeProud

Aug-10-13 11:44 AM

There is a good reason business's are not laying off people. First off Obozo has not created any jobs and second the people without jobs keep having babies and live well on welfare and food stamps. This is not a slam against the people that need to be on relief, just the idiots that don't want to work for a living and took all of Obozo's free gifts. Americans next gift, "Obozo moves out of the White House as this is his last term." It is a shame we have suffered for almost six years with this Know nothing/do nothing president.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DinoCrocetti

Aug-09-13 7:17 PM

Has anyone asked Obama how he feels about the "fastfooders" wanting a $15 an hour minimum wage?

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Aug-09-13 4:36 PM

Well stated, Ragnar.

74% of small business say they are reluctant to hire because they don't know the real impact of Obamacare yet.

Thanks Barry.

About 70% of those "new jobs" created are part time McJobs in the service area with little or no benefits.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

mikeyd

Aug-09-13 8:24 AM

vacations don't make the problems go away.

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Ragnar

Aug-09-13 6:16 AM

Hope & Change!

Still blaming Bush more than five years into his administration.

Remember when Bush blamed Clinton for the dot**** bust, recession and terror attack that he left behind? Me neither.

Bush was dealt a lousy hand and he did the best he could and never-NEVER-blamed Clinton.

His only deficit approaching $1 trillion was in his final budget year, due to the Social Democrat party real estate bust recession.

After his tax cuts and before the bubble burst, his annual deficit was down to $162 billion. That is still a deficit but it is much less than the $1 trillion deficits Soetero has had every year.

Bush also passed EIGHT consecutive budgets while Barry has yet to pass a SINGLE budget (though this is required by law-who cares about the law?)

Bush was not a true conservative and he spent far too much money, in my opinion, but he was a good and decent man. He had an awesome First Lady for a wife. He had dignity and he respected the office.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 5 of 5 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

EZToUse.com

I am looking for: