Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Senator Pushes CHIP Funding

Rockefeller wants to ensure program will continue past 2015

September 7, 2013

CHARLESTON — Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., on Friday called securing funding for the future of the Children’s Health Insurance Program a “moral imperativ....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(12)

walksabout

Sep-08-13 4:41 PM

ever notice our problems generally last as long as the term of office. Then a new mystery crisis sits in for new promise makers to tinker with under the guidance of old politicians who didn't solve the last set of troubles.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

walksabout

Sep-08-13 2:42 PM

medical care is lopsided. they get your money and you really get nothing . like restaurant. the take your money to their vault and you take their goods to the waste disposal facility

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

walksabout

Sep-08-13 2:39 PM

need to make medical care individual choice. Individual doesn't get treatment they croak.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

walksabout

Sep-08-13 2:36 PM

these silly elected folks need to drop leaflets in every country with list of demands they plan to make on the American population. would stop all the migrants seeking a better way.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

atoddh

Sep-08-13 12:07 PM

Food(freedom from hunger) is a right in the USA. Accordingly we have Food Stamps, Rag.

Medical Care is a right in every developed country except the USA. Doctors worldwide receive attractive salaries. Profiteering should not be a goal of medical providers.

Suggesting care is a right does not suggest doctors not be compensated properly.

We are very close to a national system now. The Government will impose price controls, if they are paying. This is a good thing.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Ragnar

Sep-08-13 8:58 AM

atoddh

I have to disagree with you. Someone has to provide medical care, testing, prescriptions, etc.

What you are saying is that the time, money and effort a person puts into being a doctor means nothing. That these doctors should then work as much as they are told, for whatever wages Obama deems necessary.

You are implying that one group (providers) has a legal and moral obligation to provide their product (health care) to another group (patients) with no right to sell their skills in the free market.

That sounds a lot like Communism to me.

If someone becomes a doctor and does not want Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, ObamaCare, etc. patients, that is their legal right.

If a doctor can get 1,000 patients to pay him $100 per month, cash, why should he not be permitted to do this?

Since food is a basic requirement, why not require all restaurants in Wheeling to provide full meals at $5 each, on demand?

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

atoddh

Sep-07-13 10:13 PM

The Senator is very correct in saying medical is - should be - a right of all citizens. He has worked very hard to bring the USA up to developed World standards in this regard.

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

elmgrovedude

Sep-07-13 12:50 PM

Fine and good, but I thought Obamacare was going to take care of such issues. Should not programs like CHIP be discontinued if the Affordable Care Act is fully implemented?

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TheRealityPolice

Sep-07-13 11:45 AM

Anyone in the Rockefeller family wouldn't know moral imperative if it bit them in the behind. This family is old and corrupt to the core. Hypocritical, sick, only after resources for them and their fellow high level families. This guy is a total tool. Cannot stand the sight of him. The woman looks like a zombie, too but at least she isn't into the dark stuff these people are doing behind closed doors.

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

mikeyd

Sep-07-13 8:08 AM

what do politicians know about morals?

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Ragnar

Sep-07-13 7:32 AM

Beware anyone who tells you that we have a "moral" obligation to fund any program. What they are saying is that the government has a moral right to steal your tax dollars, at gunpoint, in order to fund some program.

In effect, morality is whatever some politician claims it is. It is immoral to not fund a spending program but not immoral to rob taxpayers to pay for it.

The government constantly violates the Equal Protection Clause, by placing the wants and needs of one citizen or group of citizens over the wants and needs of another citizen or group of citizens.

I have a moral right to keep my money so that I can buy a new Jaguar. If I want to donate that money to buy health care for low income children, that, too, is my right.

But no American has a "right" to steal wealth from other Americans. No Americans wants or needs are more important than my wants or needs.

Your rights don't outweigh my rights-in a Republic.

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

dyingov

Sep-07-13 6:18 AM

"I've done in my nearly 50 years in public service."

Like he has been doing us all a favor!

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 12 of 12 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

EZToUse.com

I am looking for: