Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS

High Court Asked For Ruling On Cellphones

January 17, 2014

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court decided 40 years ago that police don’t need a search warrant to look through anything a person is carrying when arreste....

« Back to Article

sort: oldest | newest




Jan-17-14 6:25 PM

Sorry but the US Constitution and the fourth amendment are TIMELESS!!

The level of "technolgy" changes NOTHING!!!!

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"

The fourth amendment

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-17-14 6:03 PM

why else would somebody want everybody to be connected to a self reporting invisible overseer ?

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-17-14 5:59 PM

you build a weapon that harms people you are liable for this or that. you build a gadget that contributes to stealing ID, causing wrecks, you area provider. Huh ?

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-17-14 5:55 PM

new definition for cell phone will be " Self imposed stalker" Think of all the money and stress you avoid by never having one from the git go.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-17-14 8:45 AM

We are told that law abiding citizens must not be allowed to own a firearm because it MIGHT be used in a crime. Not even own one because someone might steal it and it be used in a crime. And yet cell phones are used in crimes and the police are only interested in those that are on someone who have committed a crime in front of them. Drug dealers rely heavily on cellphones to sell drugs and to pass information, even order murders. Supreme Master Obama has even arranged that his voting block of non workers must have cell phones for free and so we are treated to the spectacle of people dealing crack on the streets of Steubenville and using a cellphone paid for by the taxpayers (who are paying for their own). If the police stop someone for commiting a crime they can search them for evidence, and their cellphone is on them at the time of the crime. I do not fear the police and I support them when they are dealing with criminals in the streets. That is not me or my friends.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 5 of 5 comments

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
Remember my email address.

I am looking for: