Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Ohio Appeals Gay Marriage Order

May 10, 2014

CINCINNATI (AP) — Ohio officials on Friday appealed a federal judge’s order to recognize the marriages of gay couples who wed in other states....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(25)

SomeMoreEqual

May-12-14 5:56 AM

COeplant:"I live right here with you funny stuff, and I don't "self-segregate"'

Yep, ladies, gentlemen and others, here is denial alive and naive. If its so great go live near it. Not in a state that is almost exclusively homogeneous. Its called living it. Not talking it. Bye

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

dyingov

May-11-14 11:33 AM

caltransplant, Most of the "Hispanic" counties of the World are considered "third World" countries! So do the best of these countries come to the US? Funny stuff. Move to Southern California and tell me about the tolerance? Funny funny stuff! Whites, Blacks and Hispanics living hand-in-hand and singing songs! Funniest stuff!

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

dyingov

May-11-14 11:07 AM

caltransplant, Ohio County 93% white, Marshall County 97% white! As I said, "self segregate!" funny stuff. Move to Homewood (Pittsburgh) and I will give you credit for leading the charge on the World becoming a more tolerant place! funny stuff, fool!

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

caltransplant

May-11-14 10:43 AM

sme, liberals don't procreate? funny stuff!

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

caltransplant

May-11-14 10:41 AM

I live right here with you funny stuff, and I don't "self-segregate"' When peeps like you succumb to old age, the world becomes, ever so slightly, a better place. Fool!

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

SomeMoreEqual

May-10-14 11:08 PM

"In a Republic, 99 of the people cannot vote to take away the rights of the 1 holdout."

Dont forget, Majorities alone can amend in or out anything they like. That is the power of the Majority. Not Judges or activist minorities. The MAJORITY alone amends.

ANd for over 200 years no judge ever saw denial of homosexual so-called-marriage as a right denied. Just as we all reject fathers marrying their sons so to does the majority--including California--reject gay so called marriage.

Now we have to ask how does the Majority react to judicial overstep. Constitution Convention is one choice. ANd no judges opinion is necessary.

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Ragnar

May-10-14 10:04 PM

The beauty of living in a Constitutional Republic is that we are all equal. In a Democracy, 51 people can vote to take away the rights of the other 49 people in a 100 person room.

In a Republic, 99 of the people cannot vote to take away the rights of the 1 holdout.

We each have the right to practice our religion, or none at all-EQUALLY.

Gay marriage (joke) is in violation of the teachings of a number of religions.

By requiring one person (religious) to recognize gay marriage (gay person), the government is elevating the wants of the gay over the rights of the religious citizen.

Your rights do not trump my rights. I have the right to oppose gay marriage. You have the right to support it. Being gay has nothing to do with race, ethnicity, handicap, etc. It is a choice or preference.

By requiring me to recognize sham gay marriages, the government is stating that gays are permitted to trample on my rights. Their rights are made superior to my rights by government fia

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

SomeMoreEqual

May-10-14 5:25 PM

Self segregate? Not if activist judges have anything to do with it. But then I think the majority in this nations hopes they keep imposing radical leftists agenda.

When a 5 year old boy in COlorado is applauded for changing his gender what else with the leftists think him mature enough to decide? This is what the leftists are imposing. COnstitutional COnvention time. ANd guess who exclusively has the right to amend anything they so desire? Yeh, the MAJORITY. Uh oh.

2 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

dyingov

May-10-14 3:15 PM

caltransplant, Where do you live? You claim all the hatred, bigotry will be less as time goes on! Again, where do you live? Funny stuff. Peeps have been and will continue to self segregate! Look around, fool!

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

SomeMoreEqual

May-10-14 1:48 PM

COwplant:" ignorance, hatred, bigotry, etc... With each generation, the number of people like yourself fades. Humanity does have a future!"

Is that how that works. SO in time Fathers marrying sons will one day be happy and acceptable too? Big problem you have with the demographics, pilgrim. Liberals dont procreate and homosexual "couples" cant ever procreate together.

ANd with China, India, Russia--gee, thats most of the worlds population--rejecting gay so called marriage, I dont think the future is on your side either. But I could be wrong. Cheers

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

SomeMoreEqual

May-10-14 1:46 PM

18 states allowed different race marriage prior to the leftists imposing that on everyone. And is homosexual impulse the same as being born a certain colour? Gee, when did that happen. Keep trying, leftists. Keep nullifying the WIll of the Majority. Looking at Nevada and how Putin is laughing at the liberal west, we aint got much to worry about. Cheers

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

caltransplant

May-10-14 1:20 PM

Good one, truth!

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

caltransplant

May-10-14 1:19 PM

sme, the moral insanity began with your first comment, and it continues. Likewise, ignorance, hatred, bigotry, etc... With each generation, the number of people like yourself fades. Humanity does have a future!

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

hillbillyangel

May-10-14 10:51 AM

Getaclue, I'm fairly certain that the inter racial marriages were between a man and a woman. Your argument needs some adjustments.

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

dyingov

May-10-14 9:07 AM

clueless, The legislature of Ohio passed the anti-miscegenation law in 1861 and that same body of law makers repealed it in 1887. So should we put the same sex marriage question on the ballot (the peeps voted on the issue in 2004) and let the peeps decide? Sound fair?

0 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

May-10-14 8:54 AM

Clueless, you're the dolt who claimed a majority were against it. Unless there was a vote or a poll or something, how do you know? So you tell us when the vote was. Unless you just made that racebaiting crap up, as you usually do. LOL

1 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

May-10-14 8:47 AM

What the outcome of that vote on inter racial marriage in the state of Ohio ? I simply can't remember how that ended up.

4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

May-10-14 8:42 AM

Clueless "I'm pretty sure the majority was anti inter racial marriage"

That's a pretty dark view you have of the majority of Americans. When you honestly believe the majority of your fellow citizens are racists, why are you still living here? Don't forget that a majority of Americans elected an African American as President, so racism isn't as pervasive as you race baiting Demorats would like to think it is.

1 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

dyingov

May-10-14 8:14 AM

getaclue, really dude get a f'n clue! Did the good people of Ohio vote to not recognize inter-racial marriages? Well they did vote to not recognize same sex marriage and the vote was not even close! You progressives are so confused! Funny stuff.

1 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

dyingov

May-10-14 8:11 AM

truthless, So maybe it's time to change the laws (this one is a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT to the Ohio Constitution) based on poll numbers? I got news for you, for every poll you find the majority is on-board at 53% I will find one with the opposite majority!

Your poll: Caller (pollster) asks "are you gay?" Yes, "I have some questions for you."

Caller asks, "are you gay?" No, Click!

The law of the land will now be conducted with phone and online polls!

truthless, You get the award for one of the best ideas in 2014! funny funny stuff.

1 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

May-10-14 8:02 AM

I'm pretty sure the majority was anti inter racial marriage so maybe we should let the state of Ohio invalidate and not recognize those also.

5 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

May-10-14 7:35 AM

thetruthforonce “federal judges, by virtue of the Constitution, have a duty to interpret the Constitution. We are a nation of laws”

We’re glad you’re finally fully onboard with Supreme Court decisions. Like the Citizens United decision. Corporations are now people; the Supreme Court has spoken. And we’re glad you’re finally fully onboard with the Supreme Court decision in upholding Michigan’s ban on Affirmative Action. Affirmative Action is now racism; the Supreme Court has spoken.

So we won’t be putting up with any more whining from you leftists about Supreme Court decisions, right, truthless? LOL

2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

thetruthforonce

May-10-14 7:19 AM

Actually, S'more, Reuters has just reported that, in fact, a MAJORITY of Americans polled support the rights of gays and lesbians to marry. The number reported is 53% in favor, up from 32% in 2003. So, your rapidly fading anti-gay views are views of the minority. Further, my legal scholarly friend, federal judges, by virtue of the Constitution, have a duty to interpret the Constitution. We are a nation of laws, not of small-minded bigots such as yourself.

6 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

SomeMoreEqual

May-10-14 5:01 AM

"Chris Sevier has filed a motion to the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeal arguing that if same-sex couples are allowed to wed, he should be able to tie the knot with his Macbook."

The moral insanity has begun. This is what happens when activist judges are impatient with democracy and impose minority values on the majority. How soon before consent laws are slapped down by a judge?

3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

SomeMoreEqual

May-10-14 4:59 AM

"a federal judge's order to recognize the marriages of gay couples who wed in other states"

Outrageous. The fix is already in. The courts will continue to impose minority values on the Majority as long as people tolerate it. As the leftists fire employees at Mozilla and HGTV anyone that doesnt accept homosexuality we need to do the same.

As we all reject fathers marrying their sons so too society has rejected gay so called marriage.

3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 25 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

EZToUse.com

I am looking for: