Mobile Version: mobile.theintelligencer.net
 
RSS:
Wheeling Weather Forecast, WV
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUseBigBook Web
Special Sections  Blogs  Local News  Sports  Arts & Living  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries


  • Parade
  • Parade Games
  • Online Extras
  • I Love to Travel
  • Customer Service
  • Affiliated Sites

DOH Holds Safeco Liable

By JOSELYN KING
POSTED: June 18, 2008

WHEELING - The Safeco Surety Co. is financially liable for seeing that the Wheeling Tunnel project - bid out at a cost of almost $6 million before the project was halted - is completed.

That's why it's difficult for state officials to tell the insurance company what contractor it should use to finish the work, said Brent Walker, spokesman for the West Virginia Division of Highways.

Negotiations continued Tuesday between the WVDOH and Safeco regarding terms surrounding the restart of work on the Wheeling Tunnel. Safeco is the bond holder for the Velotta Co. of Sharon Center, Ohio, and Velotta Co. President Robert Velotta has indicated his company plans to return to the project.

All contractors who bid to do state projects are required to be bonded, Walker said. In the event there is a future problem with the project and the contractor's work, the surety company is held responsible.

Work on the eastbound tube of the Wheeling Tunnel - which started in January 2007 and was to be completed in May that year - continued until November, when work was halted by the WVDOH.

"In this particular case, the situation all revolves around how it all went down and how we cut the contract short," Walker said. "We didn't like the way the contractor was doing the work, so we canceled the contract. The discussions then turned to the surety company.

"When those situations happen with a project, the surety company is liable for it. Because of this, the agency has a hard time telling them who they can choose to get the work done. But we can insist on expectations, and that these be in writing."

Because the Safeco Surety Co. is assuring the project, it has taken over the project "from a responsibility standpoint," according to Walker. The company is financially responsible for at least the amount of the bid contract, he added.

The Velotta Co. won the contract in 2006 to renovate both tubes of the Wheeling Tunnel with a bid of $5,776,989.

Problems removing old tiles threw the project over schedule as the work was being completed by Massaro Industries of Oakmont, Pa. New tiles didn't stick to the tunnel's concrete subwalls, and the job was put on hold while experts assessed the problem.

The unfinished tunnel was reopened Nov. 15, and Velotta hasn't been paid for work since October.

Tiling still needs to be completed within the eastbound tube, as does electrical work and the placement of a closed-circuit television monitoring system.

It is not uncommon in such situations for a surety company to request their client be allowed to complete the work, especially if the bondholder believes that problems with the project can be worked out, Walker said.

"Choosing the original contractor can be in the surety company's best interest, but they are free to choose because they are on the line," he noted.

Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-6 | Post a comment
richardwhee
06-18-08 1:53 PM
Excuses--Excuses-- and more excuses. The state and Velotta are so full of it. It's no wonder W.V. is last in all areas that count. Oh! maybe they would be # 1 in pulling the wool over the eyes of we citizens.

steelercrazy
06-18-08 10:41 AM
If I can try to read between the lines of this story, which I have to because it really doesn't tell us much:

WVDOT and Velotta months ago came to some sort of agreement about payment of their original attempt at the tunnel project in 2007. However, Safeco obviously doesn't want Velotta anywhere near the tunnels, since the surety company is financially responsible for the project being completed on time. Safeco knows that Velotta doesn't have the means to complete the project on time. Therefore, Safeco wants another company to come in and complete the project. If this happens, Velotta will not get anywhere near the sum promised them by WVDOT, since the new company will need to be paid from the approximately $6 million set aside for the tunnel renovation. Am I missing anything, cause I don't think so...

Georgetwin
06-18-08 10:15 AM
They could've gotten better using a Safeway :)!

UNCOMMONSENSE
06-18-08 7:28 AM
Farming out the bidding process does not relinquish the State's liability on this project! And DOH engineers still must inspect and sign off on all work! This is a weak attempt to pass the blame!

spongebob
06-18-08 5:47 AM
S-T-O-P SAFECO IS MY AUTO-INSURANCE COMPANY AND I NEVER USE THE WHEELING TUNNELS-D-A-N-G-E-R-O-U-S- TRAFFIC PATTERNS T-O-O MANY LOCAL-YOKLES USING THEM

atoddh
06-18-08 1:57 AM
Safeco made a big mistake backing Velotta - a now proven incompetant - on this. The Wheeling Press - in the public interest - should be very circumspect about State corruption with this project. There is much incentive and WV is historically fertile ground.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
Special Sections  Blogs  Local News  Sports  Arts & Living  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries