Mobile Version: mobile.theintelligencer.net
 
RSS:
Wheeling Weather Forecast, WV
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUseBigBook Web
Special Sections | Blogs | Local News | Sports | Arts & Living | Classifieds | Jobs | CU Galleries


  • Online Extras
  • I Love to Travel
  • Customer Service
  • Affiliated Sites

Spend for Development

POSTED: July 31, 2007

ditor, News-Register:

OK, so let me get this straight: We have a surplus of nearly $1 million, and of that, city planners want $171,972 to go to “stuff”: $400,000 to go to street paving, $140,000 to go to a pay raise, and the rest to be distributed among city administration and “pet projects.” Of all that, only $50,000 was earmarked for the Ohio Valley Development Corp., and $5,000 toward Web site improvements — investments that could possibly promote city growth.

Now, I’m sure everyone has their own ideas about how this surplus should be spent, but I am disappointed in the plan City Manager Robert Herron came up with. Does he live in a different Wheeling than I do? It may be true that the city needs a new snow plow and front-end loader, and we certainly could use street paving, but the Wheeling I know has an immediate, greater need — for investors, employers and development.

I believe that the City of Wheeling has an obligation to meet this greater need and may miss out on a key opportunity to do so under Robert Herron’s current plan. I would therefore like to suggest the following alternative plan to City Council:

? Hire a top advertising agency to provide insight into how and where we should be advertising our already existing programs, low-cost labor, reasonable real estate and unique heritage to reach those businesses and individuals capable of making an investment in Wheeling. I would like to clarify that we do not need another “study” — but I do believe “expert advice” that could immediately be put to use toward a “practical goal” would be useful and worthwhile.

? Take the “lion's share” of our surplus and use it exclusively to advertise in those venues determined above to be best, which my own non-expert opinion believes would include, at a minimum: the Internet and business, real estate, and investment journals.

? Instead of a meager $5,000 toward what I expect would be “limited” improvements to the City of Wheeling Web site, spend more — and bring many of the city departments online, in a fashion similar to other progressive cities and “business4wv.com.” Additional investment to cross-promote existing internet resources such as the Heritage Trail Web site, Regional Development Web site, and the Convention & Visitors’ Bureau Web site probably wouldn’t hurt, either.

? Hire a new city employee — which would run $20,000 to $50,000 for an entire year — whose sole job is to write press releases to business, investment, and real estate journals that highlight Wheeling as a “destination” city for business, tourism, and real estate investment. Inevitably, some of these releases will be picked up, and serve to educate others in distant locations about Wheeling — the first step in bringing any investment here.

? Hire a second city employee to act as a “meet and greet” liaison between city government and any new or prospective individuals, businesses, or investors — to “take the edge off” what I consider to be some “difficult” personalities and the “complex” navigation required to “get things done.” It should be easy for business and investors to work with the city, should they be interested in doing so. I do not believe that I am alone to suggest the city can be difficult to work with at times.

? Hire a third city employee whose sole job is to identify and take advantage of federal and state grant opportunities. It is my understanding that the City of Wheeling already gets grant monies for a variety of purposes, but I wonder if they could do more.

So what are some possible results of this alternative plan?

Three new jobs, and an organized campaign to bring investment here, which in turn should bring: a) an increase in residential real property investment; b) an increase in commercial real property investment; c) an increase in business investment/development; and as an end result — d) organic growth that would provide both jobs and tax revenue for future surpluses, i.e. “everything else.”

I believe this alternative plan could be put together for $750,000 or less, which would mean there’d still be enough left over for the pay raise — or the snow plow and front loader.

Tom Wolfe

Wheeling



Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-4 | Post a comment
hellion7002
08-01-07 10:10 AM
Perhaps you should try living on MY wages. According to public records, every city worker I know of makes significantly more money than I make. Plus unlike my job, city workers have the benefit of having paid holidays in addition to the availability of ANY health coverage at all.

I will reiterate that just because the city has a significant surplus of money to allocate does NOT guarantee that it will be the same the following year as things change and costs continue to rise everywhere.

Granted you need to feed your family too, but when the cost of running the city gets too high due to payroll and miscellaneous expenses that are not currently forseen, layoffs will occur.

E2Driver
07-31-07 10:52 PM
So easy for you to say no pay raises...Try living on our income.Wheeling's pay is still far below average nationally. I don't expect to get rich working for the city, but still feel we deserve the pay raises. I commend Herron for his work on the city budget. If it weren't for his expertise there may not even be a surplus. If you factor in the rise in health plan premiums you will see that the raises are minimal. The cost of gas and everything else has gone up. We have to feed our families too.

wv26003
07-31-07 6:58 PM
Downtown is so ugly and dilapidated --- use some of the money to draw up plans for a new City-County building. Something more aesthetically pleasing, technologically compatible, and citizen friendly. Once the plans are devised, float a capital improvements levy and appropriate some of the funding for the Capitol Music Hall.

hellion7002
07-31-07 5:09 PM
It is disturbing that the city is alloting $140K to pay raises. Bonuses (if deserved) I can see, but a pay raise is extreme.

Just because the city has a surplus one year, does not guarantee that it will be the following year.

Also think about it. The city has a $1M surplus, yet still has the lousiest mass transit operation around.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
Special Sections | Blogs | Local News | Sports | Arts & Living | Classifieds | Jobs | CU Galleries