Mobile Version: mobile.theintelligencer.net
 
RSS:
Wheeling Weather Forecast, WV
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUseBigBook Web
Special Sections  Local News  Blogs  Sports  Arts & Living  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries


  • Parade Games
  • Parade
  • Pirates Report
  • Online Extras
  • I Love to Travel
  • Customer Service
  • Affiliated Sites
Top Headlines

Surrogate Motherhood Can Be Taxing — But Not Taxable

By JOSELYN KING
POSTED: June 26, 2009

WHEELING - Giving birth can be a taxing struggle for a surrogate mother, but the money she gets for her efforts most often isn't taxable.

Depending on how a surrogate's legal contract with the prospective parents is worded, she may just be receiving compensation for "pain and suffering."

This amount can exceed $30,000, and most cases this compensation isn't taxed, according to information provided by leading fertility clinics.

The issue of surrogacy came to the forefront recently as a Martins Ferry woman served as a surrogate mother for celebrity couple Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick, and gave birth to twins this week at East Ohio Regional Hospital.

Local residents, though, looking to surrogacy as a solution to fertility problems likely would have to look outside the area for clinics and doctors specializing in the practice.

Local obstetricians contacted did not want to speak about the issue.

But leading surrogacy providers such as Creative Conception Inc. of Mission Viejo, Calif., and Growing Generations of Los Angeles indicate the largest cost in the surrogacy process is the surrogate's fee.

And that fee can be higher if an "experienced" surrogate is utilized, according to both organizations.

Growing Generations lists the compensation for a first-time surrogate at $22,000, plus $5,000 in additional fees and allowances for health and life insurance, and all surrogacy related expenses. Second-time surrogates receive $25,000 plus all of the above benefits; and third-time surrogates, $30,000.

Creative Conception, meanwhile, provides a more detailed look at the costs.

First-time surrogates there are compensated at a base rate of $21,500, while second-time surrogates receive $26,500. The compensation is paid in installments of $2,500, but it isn't indicated how often these payments arrive.

The surrogate is also to receive "miscellaneous compensation" through Creative Conception during the pregnancy.

Among the listed costs for the prospective parents is up to $560 for house cleaning services for the mother.

This service would start after the 16th week of pregnancy, with the fee paid directly to a house cleaning company.

Due at the start of the 13th week of pregnancy is $600 for maternity clothes, and an additional $250 is stipulated if the surrogate is pregnant with twins or triplets.

Large amounts of money also can be due the surrogate if the pregnancy warrants additional medical procedures.

If twins are delivered, the mother receives $5,000; and for triplets, $7,000.

A Caesarean section would warrant another $2,000. And if an hysterectomy is caused by delivery, the mother would receive $5,000.

"It's a huge financial thing," said Kellie Snell, owner of Creative Conception. "Not all people who are experiencing financial problems can do it. It's what people do when they come to the end of their rope."

While she admits many of her clients are wealthier than most, she said among them have been married couples, single men and women and gay couples.

There are two different types of surrogacy.

In traditional surrogacy, the surrogate mother's own egg is fertilized with a donor sperm. In gestational surrogacy, an embryo is implanted within the surrogate mother. Success rates for each procedure vary from clinic to clinic, and statistics can run as far as two years behind, Snell said.

"What does matter is the age of the egg," she noted. "If the intended mother's egg is age 40, there is much less chance of success than if it came from a 29-year-old."

The biggest misconception about surrogate mothers is that they carry a child for money, but this is not the case, Snell said.

"I've been doing this for over 15 years," she said. "And my surrogates are wonderful people - often stay-at-home moms. Does it help their family? Yes. That's a given. But I can't say they do this for a job in general."

 
Share:
Facebook  MySpace  Digg  Stumble    Mixx  Fark  del.icio.us   LiveSpaces
 
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-14 | Post a comment
dana1974
06-30-09 12:33 AM
I'm not sure which is worse, the Infertilitybots extolling the virtues of reproductively healthy women being made into brood mares for the wealthy infertile, or the misogynists dehumanizing women who are not independently wealthy when they have their families. Anyway, I'm not for fertility technology. What's next, do we pay poor sighted people to give up their eyes to rich blind people? You need to see far more than you need to be a parent. But if we're going to indulge in this idiocy I'd rather see gestational surrogates than traditional ones. But the American attitude about reproduction in general is sick and has been for a long time. Stop destroying families and wrecking women's health just so you can say you spawned. God. Grow up.

surrogatemomto3
06-27-09 11:39 PM
Comparing carrying someone's child and giving them the gift of being a parent to prostitution is just ridiculous. I'm guessing that you haven't ever experienced infertility... Come out of the Dark Ages. This is nothing short of a miracle!

jb1967
06-27-09 11:11 PM
I think this is wonderful! Here is a young lady helping some one out. Yes she got paid but it's her body and her time carring these children. I don't care if it isn't taxed and it sure as he_l is know one elses business either. Now what if this was not the egg and sperm from the couple, not a big deal either. These children are going to have a life like no other children in the valley. It is a wonderful thing someone can make a choice on how their unborn child will live. HOORAY for the surrogate mom and the children. And again it is no one elses business what goes on in someone elses life. Some people should get a life if not help a life. Then you will have one.

Mchaz2009
06-27-09 3:29 AM
So would this be the same as a woman conceiving in order to put the child up for adoption for money?? I really don't see any issues with it. This is like apples and oranges comparing this to prostitution. If your kid needed a kidney transplant and someone matched (not related of course), would you pay them for their kidney or let your kid die. You're paying them for the use of their body. Honestly this hurts no one at all.

EllisWyatt
06-26-09 9:21 PM
Chemo therapy is the treatment of a disease that you did not seek voluntarily. Renting the use of your body is something completely different. Leave it to a Lib to compare two completely unrelated topics in order to put a moral shine on an immoral turd.

TheRealityPolice
06-26-09 12:38 PM
blackbear - if it is playing with nature, and is wrong, then I am going to play Devil's Advocate with you. ~grin~ Chemo treatment for cancer is "playing with nature". Vaccinations for children are "playing". Antibiotics are "playing". I could go on and on....but what I am trying to point out is that the "playing with nature is wrong" argument is not a good argument. Medical ethics is an interesting topic.

TheRealityPolice
06-26-09 12:33 PM
I truly see no issue on this procedure. Basically, a couple wants a baby and for whatever reason, their "plumbing" is not working properly. If they are financially well off enough to afford it, and find the right recipient, then why not? Reproductive Science has advanced by leaps over the past several years; why not use it? I'd rather see this than moms on welfare having 3 or 4 kids and sitting at home collecting benefits. What DOES give me the willies is cloning - I do NOT support cloning humans, fwiw, even if it is possible.

rockdrummer
06-26-09 12:29 PM
jbowsher, no. the surrogate provides a vessel for the sperm and egg from the mother and father. She is being paid for a service, but is not selling babies. Geesh. Do a little research.

jbowsher
06-26-09 12:05 PM
Doesn't it all amount to buying babies?

rockdrummer
06-26-09 10:02 AM
You people are truly stupid. This is a medical procedure. We can't grow babies to term in test tubes. A surrogate helps people who want babies (but are unable to conceive them) have them. They are not being paid to fornicate, you moron.

blackbear
06-26-09 8:50 AM
it's playing with nature and it's wrong.

Highland
06-26-09 7:14 AM
Ask a tax lawyer. The payment may be considered a gift and, if it exceeds a certain number, would fall under gift tax provisions of federal law.

EllisWyatt
06-26-09 7:09 AM
There is something morally deranged about having a baby for strangers in return for a cash payment. Does this make you any better than a prostitute-selling the use of your body for money? You can spin it however you like-helping couples in need, blah blah blah. Prostitution sometimes helps couples in need, too. Improving their sex lives, letting them live out fantasies, earning money. Yet, somehow, we frown on prostitution of the sex organs but praise prostitution of the womb.

Very sick.

BTW, it is not a stretch to say that this money is not taxed. We already pay far too many trashy women to have babies, through welfare payments, educational expenses, child care credits, etc.

In effect, we pay people to fornicate.

beautifulohio
06-26-09 6:35 AM
Thank God for women who can do this for others. I would never be able to give up a child I carried in my body for 9 months. It takes a special person to do this. I imagine there are some who do it for money, others do it for family, which is so special. I am not sure though that it's the right thing to do. Where exactly is this technology leading us, and do we really want to go there? Questions I really think we should ask ourselves. I don't have the answers. With all this surrogate isn't just a matter of time before brother and sister end up married? Maybe far fetched but could happen.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
 
Special Sections  Local News  Blogs  Sports  Arts & Living  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries