Plenty of Vacancies In the Friendly City
Property owners register their empty structuresBy CASEY JUNKINS Staff Writer
Article Photos
WHEELING - Answering questions and shuffling forms, Nancy Prager hurried Thursday to organize about 60 vacant building registration forms.
But Prager, Wheeling's Economic and Community Development director, said there are still about 50 structures citywide that meet the "vacant" definition that still need to be registered.
"This program is designed to hold people accountable for their property. ... If you come in now, we will accept your registration without penalty," she said.
Prager noted about 17 building owners made their way to her office to document their structures on the final day of regular registration. Wheeling was able to adopt the ordinance that registers vacant buildings because of its participation in the West Virginia Municipal Home Rule Pilot Program.
"We are now making a list of 'known' vacant buildings, and are going to mail letters to the people we believe own them to ask them to register. If we do not have compliance, then we will follow the ordinance," she said.
The legislation states, "The failure or refusal for any reason of any owner, or agent of an owner acting on behalf of the owner, to register a vacant building upon adoption of this ordinance or to pay any fees required to be paid pursuant to the provisions of this section, within 30 days after they become due, shall constitute a violation punishable upon conviction thereof by a fine in the amount of not less than $100 nor more than $500 for each failure or refusal to pay a required vacant building fee, as applicable. In such cases, whenever the minimum fine of $100 is imposed, it shall not be subject to suspension or reduction for any reason."
Prager referred questions regarding intentions to pursue legal action against property owners who don't register their buildings to City Manager Robert Herron. He declined to comment.
Though concerned about those who failed to register, Prager thanked and acknowledged those who made the effort to document their structures.
"Some have come in to register buildings that are not in all that bad of shape. Many of them are pretty well-maintained," she said.
The city defines a "vacant" structure as one that meets all the following criteria:
- No person lives or conducts business in any part of the building;
- The structure has one or more building code violations;
- No utilities have serviced the building for at least 30 days.
The fees for vacant buildings range from $200 initially to $1,600 for buildings that remain vacant for five years.
But Councilman James Tiu said the program's intention is not to generate revenue. "Our intention as a council is to make sure structures remain safe. I hope we don't collect any money. This is designed to regulate - it is not designed to punish," he said.
Councilwoman Gloria Delbrugge said the city should "take all steps to get these people to comply."
"I can promise you, the people who own these vacant buildings live nowhere near them," she said.
Prager said vacant buildings lead to many problems for Wheeling officials. "Statistically, the crime rate is higher where there are vacant buildings. Home values go down, hurting all of the neighbors," she said, noting such buildings are fire and safety hazards. She said drug dealers have also been known to hide inside some of the structures.
|
wisdomborn
|
|
|---|---|
|
10-04-09 6:06 PM
|
Ellis, "Such people"? Not all who must live in public housing are bad people, but are the working poor,& their decision to live in public housing was made for them due to one little reason: where else would they go. Just how many decent apartment complexes exist in Wheeling that are NOT public housing or section 8 slum-like housing? I can think of only one complex, and they cost something like $500 a month...before utilities. That's 50% of what a person working full-time on minimum makes. No, those living in Woodsdale don't want "such people" living next door, but many of those living in that neck of the woods support poverty, in that they do not support increases in minimum wage, etc, or are business owners who fail to pay their workers over minimum, almost as if they are angry at the poor for being poor, or, for hating being poor. Well if communities dont welcome the working poor, guess who WILL come to dinner? The non-working poor.
|
|
PCGS70
|
|
|
10-02-09 11:40 PM
|
I wonder if the City of Wheeling registered the old shooting range building on the island. HA!
|
|
PCGS70
|
|
|
10-02-09 11:36 PM
|
I'm not signing anything.
|
|
GoochStephens
|
|
|
10-02-09 8:40 PM
|
Ellis..not only would it be cheaper..possibly profitable. An electrical fire..insurance payout minus a reduced cleanup fee....Hmmm I guess that would be called progress in Wheeling?
|
|
EYEINTHESKY
|
|
|
10-02-09 9:16 AM
|
It seems to me that this is an issue of due process. Whethter or not the building is in code violation is a matter of fact determined by the City. Only when the determination is made and proper notice given should the owner register the property. Otherwise, the owner is self incriminating themselves by registering.
|
|
EllisWyatt
|
|
|
10-02-09 5:48 AM
|
So, if you keep the electric hooked up and pay the $10 per month charge, you can avoid paying this ridiculous fee? It might be cheaper to go that route. BTW, how would the city know about statistics and crime rates? Are accurate figures sent to the FBI for the crime report database? I don't believe so. Just comparing the crime in the newspaper with what actually shows up in the FBI stats will tell you that. The city says that as an excuse. How would they know about different crime rates here or there? The police actually have to leave Sheetz, go patrol and arrest suspects. Even when there is shady activity occuring, Wheeling PD rolls right past. In all fairness, it might be shift change time and they don't want to have to fill out paperwork that will keep them from going home. Home values also go down when you close housing projects and distribute the losers into Woodsdale. Who wants to live around such people?What does the city have to say about THAT?
|





