Curbing EPA A Necessity
By The IntelligencerSenate Majority Leader Harry Reid's admission last week that he cannot find enough votes to enact the newest incarnation of "cap and trade" was welcome news - but not entirely candid.
Reid told reporters an energy bill in the House will be limited to provisions regarding energy efficiency and offshore oil and gas drilling, in response to the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. New limits on coal-fired power plants will not be included in the bill.
Here is how Reid explained it to reporters:
"It's easy to count to 60 ... My point is this: We know where we are. We don't have the votes."
Reid's comment about not being able to convince 60 senators to vote in favor of cap and trade was a clear attempt to make it sound as if Republicans are blocking the measure. It takes 60 senators to cut off debate on a bill and move to a vote on it. There are 41 Republicans in the Senate - able, if they vote together, to block bills supported by the 57 Democrats and two Independents.
But cap and trade is not a mere partisan dispute. While most Republicans oppose it, a substantial number of Democrats do, too.
Despite what Reid, President Barack Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi want Americans to believe, cap and trade is not just a Democrats vs. Republicans controversy. Thoughtful Democrats worry about the economic devastation it would wreak in states such as West Virginia and Ohio. Those from states without their own coal industries worry about the reaction of voters to much higher electric bills; slightly less than 50 percent of the nation's power is generated in coal-fired plants.
The death - at least for now - of cap and trade means Obama's administration will move forward with plans to cripple the coal industry through Environmental Protection Agency mandates.
That makes it vital for Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., to advance a bill he has sponsored to restrict the EPA's power for a two-year period. We urge Rockefeller to make the bill a priority - and to enlist reasonable senators on both sides of the political aisle to support the measure.
Reid, Pelosi and Obama will not be happy about their defeat in the Senate. They will push the EPA to accelerate its anti-coal campaign. Only a bill such as Rockefeller's can stop it.
|
formerohvalleyresident
|
|
|---|---|
|
07-27-10 10:33 AM
|
The EPA needs to get neutered! They are simply an impediment to the recovery of the economy. The dumbest EPA story I have heard recently is that they were preventing the Dutch oil collection boats from working in the Gulf BP spill because EPA has regulation that the water DUMPED into the ocean must be 99% pure! So instead of allowing a ship that could remove 47,000 gallons of oil a DAY to do its job, it was blocked because it only produced about 95% pure water. So the Gulf continued to be polluted with an extra 47,000 gallons a day! Real brilliant, EPA! The EPA is purely a negative "Can't DO" organization, it doesn't do a single thing to enable economic growth.
|
|
atoddh
|
|
|
07-26-10 9:42 PM
|
Oldsteel:Rockefeller's earmarks are almost all for out of state beneficiaries except for his Mother's neuro institute at WVU.He is up for some prime committee slots now.He will tow the party line as you suggest.
|
|
oldsteelmaker
|
|
|
07-26-10 10:19 AM
|
You expect Rockefeller to support the people who elected him, instead of his party leadership? You are joking, aren't you?
|
|
atoddh
|
|
|
07-26-10 1:53 AM
|
C&T is being postponed until after the election. The best thing for WV to do is diversify asap. Mountaintop is a gonner.
|









