Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | Home RSS
What's Trending »
 
 
 

W.Va. Seeks an Edge In ‘Cracker’ Contest

State that scores the plant will get thousands of jobs

January 23, 2012
By LAWRENCE MESSINA, Associated Press Writer , The Intelligencer / Wheeling News-Register

CHARLESTON (AP) - The Legislature aims to send a major signal this week as West Virginia courts at least two major employers and competes with neighboring Ohio and Pennsylvania for a chemical plant expected to create thousands of jobs.

The House of Delegates is on track to vote on a proposal to slash property taxes for a "cracker" facility for 25 years. The Senate is also moving on its version of this measure from Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin.

"What we're trying show those parties that are interested in investing $2 billion in West Virginia is that the state is ready to step forward," House Finance Chairman Harry Keith White, D-Mingo, said after his committee endorsed the legislation Friday.

Article Photos

AP Photo
Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin delivers his State of the State address Jan. 11 in Charleston. A major proposal was a 25-year property tax break to attract a “cracker” facility to West Virginia.

A cracker plant converts a byproduct from natural gas wells into a widely used chemical compound. The region's gas-rich Marcellus shale field is producing an ample supply of this byproduct, ethane, operators say. The converted compound, ethylene, is a key component for the plastics industry and also helps make a range of products including tires and antifreeze.

The proposal would apply to any company that invests at least $2 billion toward a cracker. The American Chemistry Council estimates that it would cost around $3.2 billion to build one in West Virginia, with the construction phase fueling 8,000 jobs with a combined payroll of $363 million.

The trade group also pegs the permanent jobs from a West Virginia cracker at 12,271, with 2,484 people employed directly in the chemical industry and 6,262 indirectly through its supply chain, plus 3,524 "induced" jobs triggered by the subsequent increase in consumer spending. The council estimates the total resulting payroll at $729 million and state tax revenues at $95 million.

Tomblin's proposal is expected to help his administration negotiate with energy giant Shell and an as-yet-undisclosed employer. Each seeks to build a cracker plant in the Marcellus region, officials say. But that also has Ohio and Pennsylvania assembling and promoting incentive packages as well.

Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., wrote to a Shell executive earlier this month, casting his state as the best site for a cracker. Ohio Gov. John Kasich reportedly made the same pitch for his state late last year when he flew to Shell's U.S. headquarters in Houston.

"Our package is every bit as competitive," Tomblin's Commerce secretary, Keith Burdette, said Saturday. "In my own mind, I am convinced that we've put the best we have on the table."

That includes existing tax credits aimed at economic development that would apply to a cracker, Burdette said. Complementing these are West Virginia's energy and workers' compensation costs, which are lower than Ohio's or Pennsylvania's, he said.

Both those states also owe a combined $5.5 billion from federal loans required to keep unemployment benefits flowing following the recession. West Virginia never needed those loans, and so will avoid hiking taxes on employers to repay them, Burdette said.

Deputy Revenue Secretary Mark Muchow estimates that a $2 billion cracker plan would see its taxes cut by nearly $30 million in the first year alone under Tomblin's proposal.

The measure applies to non-real estate property, in this case business machinery, equipment and inventory. Labeled "personal" property by the West Virginia Constitution, these assets are normally taxed at 60 percent of their market value. The proposal would instead assess this property at 5 percent by declaring it salvaged.

Muchow said that would value a $2 billion cracker facility at $100 million for property tax purposes, instead of at $1.2 billion. The counties considered likely sites for a cracker tax such as an industrial property at 2.5 percent, resulting in a $1.5 million annual tax bill, Muchow said. A cracker would otherwise be charged around $30 million that first year.

 
 

EZToUse.com

I am looking for: