Replacement Workers Hired for Striking Langeloth Factory Employees
LANGELOTH, Pa. — The jobs of 83 union employees at Langeloth Metallurgical Co., on strike for four months, may be in peril after the company allegedly hired replacement workers.
“The company sent an email to our international representative (Friday) saying they’re going to hire replacement workers,” Jim Hall, president of United Auto Workers Local 1311, said Tuesday afternoon.
It is not known definitively whether replacement workers are at the plant, although a couple of union pickets said Tuesday that the parking lot had more vehicles than usual.
Management at the metal fabricating firm, in the Langeloth section of Smith Township, did not respond to multiple requests for comment from a reporter.
A security official at the gate to the plant said the company liaison for the media would not be available Tuesday.
Hall said he heard different replacement personnel figures in recent days. A source told him over the weekend that “about 100” replacement workers had been hired; then on Tuesday, the local president said he heard that 64 of them arrived Monday for training.
UAW members began the work stoppage Sept. 9 in a dispute over “seniority, scheduling changes and the opportunity to bid (for jobs) with the labor board,” Hall said. Seniority, the key issue with the union, enables workers with the longest service time to get priority when certain jobs are available. Pay, Hall said, was not part of the equation. “We didn’t ask for a raise.”
The two sides have talked only once, on Dec. 5, but made no progress. That bothers state Rep. Jason Ortitay, R-Cecil, who believes “both sides had reason to compromise.”
“There’s no reason this needed to happen,” he said. “This has lasted four months, so there does not appear to be a big commitment to work together.”
Ortitay, whose district includes a large swath of northern Washington County, appeared at the work site each of the past two days. He said he attempted to speak to two management officials on Monday, but had to leave his cellphone number for them and did not get a call back.
An attorney for the company did call him, Ortitay said, “but I didn’t want to talk to an attorney. I’m very disappointed the company did not give me the courtesy of a call back.