×
X logo

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox.

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)

You may opt-out anytime by clicking "unsubscribe" from the newsletter or from your account.

West Virginia Senate Passes Anti-Fossil Fuel Boycott Bill

Photo Courtesy of W.Va. Legislative Photography - State Sen. Owens Brown, D-Ohio explains his opposition to a bill allowing the State Treasurer to pull deposits from banks that boycott fossil fuel industries.

CHARLESTON — Days after expressing their support for nuclear energy, members of the West Virginia Senate expressed support Thursday for a bill standing up against banks that boycott doing business with the coal and natural gas industries.

The Senate passed Senate Bill 262 on Thursday morning 31-2, with one member absent and not voting. Sens. Eric Nelson, R-Kanawha, and Owens Brown, D-Ohio, voted no. The bill now heads to the House of Delegates.

SB 262 would authorize the State Treasurer’s Office to restrict state banking contracts with any bank or investment group that refuses to deal with coal or natural gas companies or terminates contracts with existing fossil fuel companies as a way to punish the companies for engaging in extractive industries.

The State Treasurer’s Office would be required to maintain a public list of restricted financial institutions. Any bank on the restricted list would be unable to enter into new banking contracts with the State Treasurer’s Office or remain in current contracts. Financial institutions that can show they are not or no longer engaged in energy company boycotts would be removed from the list.

The bill applies to any bank, banking association, investment house, savings and loan, credit union or savings bank where the State Treasurer Office might decide to deposit state taxpayer funds into. The State Treasurer does not regulate banking institutions.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Eric Tarr, R-Putnam, said the bill gives the State Treasurer authority to pull state tax dollars, such as severance tax revenue from coal and natural gas, from banks who also choose to boycott the same fossil fuel industries they’re benefiting from in the form of accrued interest on state deposits.

“There are banks that are taking action to go in and weaponize the earnings they make off your constituents’ taxpayer dollars against them,” Tarr said. “This is a bill to protect every West Virginian, whether they work in the energy sector or not.

“This in no way is telling a business that they cannot boycott the energy sector,” Tarr said. “What we’re going to say is if you’re going to use the citizens of West Virginia’s money against them, go do business somewhere else. It gives the Treasurer that authority.”

State Treasurer Riley Moore is supportive of the bill. He took similar actions last week against BlackRock Inc., an investment management company that urges companies it invests in to commit to “net zero” energy policies. Sen. Mike Caputo, D-Marion, is a leader in the United Mine Workers of America which has led protests at BlackRock’s New York City headquarters. The company owns a stake in Warrior Met Coal, where miners in Alabama have been on strike for the past 10 months.

“All those guys want is what they had back in 2016,” Caputo said. “(Warrior Met Coal) is making tons of money off the backs of hardworking people, and BlackRock is at the table. They’re divesting in coal, but not only are they divesting in coal, they’re divesting in hardworking American coal miners.”

Brown, who led the opposition to the bill in both the Senate’s Energy, Industry and Mining Committee and Finance Committee last week, called the bill “bad policy.”

“I’m not against coal, but what I am against is bad laws,” Brown said. “It’s not only about bad law, it’s about hypocrisy. What about the individual freedom to boycott? What this bill does is it eliminates that freedom to boycott. What happened to the belief in the free market? What this bill does is it chooses winners and losers. I see this as the government getting in the way of business and picking and choosing. How far can a government intrude upon a private business? That’s the question that must be answered.”

NEWSLETTER

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)
Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper? *

COMMENTS

Starting at $4.73/week.

Subscribe Today